NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Tuu v Luu [2005] NSWLC 12 JURISDICTION: Civil PARTIES: Thi Ha TUU Nga LUU FILE NUMBER: 1832 of 2004 PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre DATE OF DECISION: 09/02/2005 MAGISTRATE: Magistrate H Dillon CATCHWORDS: Procedure - Subpoena to produce - Subpoena to third party - Whether subpoena "fishing" - Whether subpoena too wide - Whether subpoena amounts to discovery against a third party LEGISLATION CITED: Aiden Shipping Co v Interbulk [1986] AC 965 Arhill v General Terminal Co (1991) 23 NSWLR 545 Australian Workers Union v Bowen (1946) 72 CLR 575 Commissioner of Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 CASES CITED: Nilsen v Loyal Orange Trust (1999) 76 IR 180 Principal Registrar of the Supreme Court of NSW v Tastan (1994) 75 A Crim R 498 Procinsky v McDermott & Rogers [1955] 4 DLR 606 R v Alister (1984) 154 CLR 404 Southern Pacific Hotel Services v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation [1984] 1 NSWLR 710 Woodside Petroleum Development Pty Ltd v H & R E & W Pty Ltd (1999) 20 WAR 380 Mr J Sheller Counsel for the applicants REPRESENTATION: DGB Lawyers Solicitors for the applicants Mr P Gray - Grzeskiewicz Counself for the 2nd Respondent Perla & Jordan Solicitors for the 2nd Respondent ORDERS: 1. Second respondent's subpoenae to applicants issued 5 August 2005 set aside.; 2. Second respondent's subpoena to applicants issued 28 June 2005 set aside in part (see paragraphs [52] ff).; 3. Costs orders will follow submissions from parties.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate