NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Auswild & Ors V Blacktown City Council [1999] NSWLEC 67
PARTIES Applicant Auswild & Ors
Respondent Blacktown City Council
NUMBER: 10834 of 1998
CORAM: Cowdroy AJ
KEY ISSUES: Development :- Development consent - existing use - intensification of use - application for extension of hotel operating hours - no restriction of trading hours in consent - subsequent planning instrument - s 109B rendering further consent unnecessary
Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 ss36(5), LEGISLATION CITED: s 106, s 107, s 108, s 109, s 109B
DATES OF HEARING: 03/11/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 03/23/1999
Applicant Mr S Austin QC (Barrister)
Solicitors Freehill Hollingdale and Page LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent Mr J Kildea (Barrister)
Solicitors Taylor Kelso
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10834 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy AJ OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 23/03/99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate