NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Horton -v- Dept of State & Regional Development [2006] NSWIRComm 1020
APPLICANT PARTIES: Rebecca Horton RESPONDENT Department of State & Regional Development
FILE NUMBER(S): 987 of 2005
CORAM: Cambridge C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - termination of employment - misconduct - performance and conduct improvement plan - further misconduct - investigation - employment record considered - repeated failure to comply with reasonable instructions of employer - valid substantive basis established - proper process followed - application dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Public Service Management Act 1988
HEARING DATES: 07/09/2005; 08/09/2005; 21/11/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/10/2006
APPLICANT Ms E Raper, barrister Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: KR Lawyers
RESPONDENT Ms E Brus, barrister
DECISION: - 15 -
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
10 February 2006
Matter No IRC 987 of 2005
Rebecca Horton -v- Department Of State & Regional Development
Application by R Horton re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1020
1 This matter involves an unfair dismissal claim made pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW] (the Act). The claim was made by Rebecca Horton (the applicant), and taken against her former employer, the Department of State & Regional Development (NSW), (the employer). 2 The claim was filed on 25 February 2005 and following unsuccessful conciliation proceedings the Arbitration of the matter was conducted over three days, 7, 8 September and 21 November 2005.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate