NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 3) [2000] NSWLEC 71 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Anthony Phillip Maurici RESPONDENT: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue FILE NUMBER(S) : 30039 of 1999 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 3 - valuation appeal - appeal successful - no exceptional circumstances LEGISLATION CITED: Land & Environment Court Act, s38(1)(2), s 56A, s 69(2) Berk v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) (1992) 78 LGERA 180; Commissioner of Valuation v Jamaica Gypsum Ltd (1971) 14 RRC 4 (Ryde's Rating Cases); Dobrel v Valuer General (No 2) (1993) 80 LGERA 26; Esso Exploration and Production Australia Inc v Shire of Morwell (1985) 60 LGRA 82; MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 67; CASES CITED: Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) (1999) 105 LGERA 318; Murray Publishers Pty Ltd v Valuer General (1994) 84 LGERA 13; New South Wales Golf Club Ltd v Valuer General (1994) 82 LGERA 188; Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365; Raiti v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1991) 72 LGRA 333; Seatainer Terminals Ltd v Valuer General (1974) 29 LGRA Tricas v Valuer General (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 29 May 1992, unreported) DATES OF HEARING: 28/02/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/14/2000
APPLICANT: J Stoljar (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Speed & Stracey LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: J H H Blackman (Barrister) SOLICITORS: I V Knight
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate