NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Pritchard v Trident Global Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 83
APPLICANT Jason Patrick Pritchard PARTIES: RESPONDENT Trident Global Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6269 of 2005
CORAM: Staff J
Practice and procedure - Unfair Dismissal application - Application by respondent for adjournment of hearing and variation of directions - Practice Direction 17 - Clear and compelling reasons required for adjournment - Adjournment refused - Limited variation to directions granted CATCHWORDS: Unfair Dismissal application - Application by respondent for adjournment of hearing and variation of directions - Practice Direction 17 - Clear and compelling reasons required for adjournment - Adjournment refused - Limited variation to directions granted
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Dedov v Apollo Life Sciences Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 55 CASES CITED: Gu v Nature's Care Manufacture Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 39 Zammit v KTS Logistics Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 36
HEARING DATES: 08/03/2006 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 03/08/2006
APPLICANT Solicitor: Ms G Ramensky Ramensky Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Solicitor: Ms R Batt Rosey Batt & Associates
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Staff J
8 March 2006
Matter No IRC 6269 of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate