NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 109 LGERA 263
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sealark Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2000] NSWLEC 166 APPLICANT: Sealark Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Shoalhaven City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10769 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- Preliminary determination of questions whether proposed subdivision creating concessional lots is permissible development. LEGISLATION CITED: Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 cl 11 CASES CITED: Smith v Shoalhaven Council (unreported 30 November 1994) DATES OF HEARING: 5th May 2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2000
APPLICANT: Mr M J Astill, Solicitor SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J Webster, Barrister SOLICITORS Morton and Harris
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 10769 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 2 August 2000
SEALARK PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
SHOALHAVEN CITY COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. The Council has raised a number of questions of law for preliminary determination in pending class 1 proceedings involving an appeal pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EP&A Act), s 97 against the Council's determination refusing development consent to the Applicant's development application to subdivide land known as lot 8 Deposited Plan 880060 situate at St Georges Basin (the appeal site) into eight lots.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate