NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Carey V North Sydney Council [1999] NSWLEC 174
PARTIES APPLICANT: Carey
RESPONDENT: North Sydney Council
NUMBER: 10403-4 of 1999
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Development :- Development-appeals- proposed attached dwellings - whether attic level excepted from "storey" definition - whether proposals involve an overdevelopment - effect on streetscape - external impact on amenity of neighbouring properties.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 North Sydney LEP 1989
DATES OF HEARING: 07/19/1999; 07/20/1999; 07/21/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 07/29/1999
APPLICANT: Mr J Bingham (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Deacons Graham and James LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr D R Parry (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT: TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION 1-5 B. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS 6 C. THE DEVELOPMENT SITES AND THE SURROUNDING AREA 7 D. THE APPLICABLE PLANNING CONTROLS 8-29 E. DOES EACH PROPOSAL INVOLVE A BUILDING HAVING MORE THAN TWO STOREYS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE LEP CL 12(1)? 30-64 F. THE PLANNING MERITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 65-85 G. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDERS 86 IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 10403 and 10404 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 29 July 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate