NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Stuart Frumar and others v Leo Faibicher [2007] NSWIRComm 22
FIRST APPLICANT Stuart Frumar
SECOND APPLICANT Jasso Pty Limited PARTIES: THIRD APPLICANT Stuart Frumar as trustee for the SS Frumar Family Trust
RESPONDENT Leo Faibicher
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3706 of 2006
CORAM: Boland J
Practice and Procedure - Application to extend time to appeal - Delay in filing appeal due to error of legal advisor - Appeal filed in incorrect jurisdiction - Principles to be applied - Application granted CATCHWORDS: Appeal - Extension of time to appeal - Delay in filing appeal due to error of legal advisor - Appeal filed in incorrect jurisdiction - Principles to be applied - Application granted.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Cavacuiti and Another v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd (2002) 122 IR 247 Faibicher v Frumar and Others [2006] NSWIRComm 327 Gallo v Dawson (1990) 64 ALJR 458 CASES CITED: Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd and Anor v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Childs) [2006] NSWIRComm 355 LEP International Pty Limited v Caine (1999) 97 IR 35 Skelly v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd (1993) 53 IR 3 Vilenius v Heinegar (1962) 36 ALJR 200 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Salmon) v Parkes Council (1996) 70 IR 298
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate