NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Exo Pty Ltd Trading As Tibby Rose Auto v Inspector Barnabas Ching. Application by Exo Pty Ltd Trading As Tibby Rose Auto to stay the judgment of Justice Marks given on 23.2.2006 in matter No IRC 5013 of 2001 [2006] NSWIRComm 113
APPELLANT: Exo Pty Ltd (t/as Tibby Rose Auto) PARTIES: RESPONDENT: Inspector Barnabas Ching
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1836 of 2006
CORAM: Haylen J
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - s 15(1) - workplace fatality - at first instance serious breach found - little evidence as to financial circumstances of defendant - penalty of $90,000 imposed - on appeal application made to stay payment of penalty - appeal limited to severity of penalty - grounds for stay allege hardship if penalty to be paid before appeal determined - no further evidence as to financial circumstances of applicant for stay - no case made for stay - application for stay refused
CASES CITED: State of New South Wales (Department of Public Works and Services and Department of Education and Training) v the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Page) (2000) 101 IR 131.
HEARING DATES: 30/03/2006 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 03/30/2006
APPELLANT: Mr K Spencer, Solicitor SOLICITORS: Spencer Whitby & Co. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT: Mr R Reitano of counsel SOLICITORS: WorkCover Authority of New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate