NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Barrick Australia and Ors [2004] NSWLEC 306 APPLICANT: Williams PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Barrick Australia and Ors
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40948; 40010 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- class 4 proceedings alleging breaches of legislation-whether public interest litigation-whether special circumstances justifying departure from ordinary rule of practice that the successful party receive costs. Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69 LEGISLATION CITED: National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, s 176A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 123 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; CASES CITED: Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229; Save The Showground For Sydney Inc v The Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (1998) 105 LGERA 354; Williams v The Minister for Environment and Heritage [2004] FCAFC 58 DATES OF HEARING: 04/02/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/2004
APPLICANT: A Oshlack (agent)
SOLICITORS N/A
FIRST AND SECOND RESPONDENTS N Williams SC LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: THIRD RESPONDENT N/A FOURTH RESPONDENT M Brennan (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS FIRST, SECOND AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS Blake Dawson Waldron THIRD RESPONDENT National Parks and Wildlife Service
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate