NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Active Tree Services Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 431
APPELLANT: Active Tree Services Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 60001 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- whether the Appellant contravened tree preservation order - onus of proof for matters under the Rural Fires Act 1997 - whether penalty imposed by Local Court should be reduced on the basis of the parity principle
Clean Waters Act 1970 Crimes Act 1900 s 556A Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 2001 s 31, s 37 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1986 s 10 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 26, s 76A, s 125, s 127 Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance cl 42 Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 Rural Fires Act 1997 s 100C, s 100D, s 100G
ADI Limited v Environment Protection Authority [2000] NSWCCA 333; Avel Pty Ltd v Multicoin Amusements Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 88; Baiada & Ors v Waste Recycling & Processing Service of NSW (1999) 130 LGERA 52; Director-General, Department of Land and Water Conservation v Bailey (2003) 136 LGERA 242; DPP v United Telecaster Sydney Ltd (1990) 168 CLR 594; Environment Protection Authority v Attard [2000] NSWCCA 242; CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; Lowe v R (1984) 154 CLR 606; Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295; R v Glasby (2000) 115 A Crim R 465; R v Ismunandar; R v Siregar (2002) 136 A Crim R 206; Thorneloe v Filipowski (2001) 52 NSWLR 60
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate