NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Townsend v Evans Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 146
APPLICANTS PARTIES : Colin Townsend and Mary-Rose Townsend
RESPONDENT Evans Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10445 of 2003 CORAM: Nott C KEY ISSUES: Subdivision :- Rural property - six lots of 5 ha or less and a residue lot of 163 ha - economic viability of small lots - setbacks from boundary - impacts on agricultrual potential LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 27-29 October 2003, 5 January 2004 EX TEMPORE 01/05/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANTS Mr D Olney, solicitor SOLICITORS Booth Brown Samuels & Olney LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Crennan, solicitor SOLICITORS McIntosh, McPhillamy & Co
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10445 of 2003
Nott C
5 January 2004
Colin Townsend & Mary-Rose Townsend Applicants v
Evans Shire Council Respondent
Judgment
1 . This is an appeal against the council's deemed refusal of a development application to subdivide two adjoining parcels of land being part of lot 75 DP192661 and having an area of 101.2 ha and lot 3 DP790716 having an area of 96.56 ha excluding the area of a road. These two parcels, which I will call the subject land, are shown in the plan of the existing boundaries being part of the documents lodged with the class 1 appeal exhibit B. I reproduce below the relevant parts of this plan of the existing boundaries of the subject land.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate