NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Leichhardt Council v Telstra Corporation [2005] NSWLEC 152
APPLICANT: Leichhardt Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Telstra Corporation
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41610 of 2004
CORAM: Lloyd J
Construction and Interpretation :- subordinate legislation - Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 - applicability of Determination to land zoned Open Space - characterisation of land as an area of environmental significant and a heritage item pursuant to Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000 - relevance of context - use of s 15AB Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) - expressio unius est exclusio alterius - generalia specialibus non derogant KEY ISSUES:
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Telecommunications (Low-Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 (Cth), s 1.4; Pt 2, ss 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5(7); Pt 3, sub-cll 3.1(1) and (2) Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000, sub-cll 13(2)(b) and (g) cll, 15, 16 and 25(1); Schedules 2 and 3
Canada Bay City Council v Optus Mobile Pty Ltd [2004] NSWLEC 611; Lee and Anor v Pittwater Council, New South Wales Land and Environment Court, 20 June 1996, Unreported; Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 118 CLR 628 at 635; CASES CITED: Greek Herald Pty Ltd v Nikolopoulos (2002) 54 NSWLR 165; Metropolitan Gas Co v Federated Gas Employees' Industrial Union (1924) 35 CLR 449; Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate