NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Pancorp Australia Pty Limited [2002] NSWLEC 38 PROSECUTOR PARTIES : Environment Protection Authority DEFENDANT Pancorp Australia Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50106; 50107; 50108 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- cause waters to be polluted - mitigation Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 Evidence Act 1995 s 184 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Pesticides Act 1978 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 120(1), s 241(1), s 241(1)(a), s 241(1)(b), s241(1) (c) Land and Environment Regulation 2000 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 04/03/2002, 05/03/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/22/2002
PROSECUTOR Mr T G Howard (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr A M Gruzman (Barrister) SOLICITORS Shipton & Associates
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50106 – 8 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 22 March 2002
Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Pancorp Australia Pty Limited Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. The defendant has pleaded guilty to three charges that it committed an offence against s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Act 1997 ("the PEO Act") in that it polluted waters on or about 2 June 2000.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate