NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Botany Bay City Council v Baladi and Ors. [2003] NSWLEC 444 APPLICANT: Botany Bay City Council PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Baladi and Ors. FILE NUMBER(S) : 41029 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights :- Change of existing use - Use prohibited by Local Environmental Plan Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, s 106 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl.45 Botany Local Environmental Plan 1995 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 17/12/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/17/2003
APPLICANT: Mr T O'Connor, Solicitor SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr A Galasso, Barrister SOLICITORS Dan Simpson and Associates
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BIGNOLD J
17 December 2003
41029 of 2003
BOTANY BAY CITY COUNCIL v BALADI AND ORS
JUDGMENT 1. HIS HONOUR: The Court has before it two related proceedings: a class 4 proceeding in which the Council claims declaratory and injunctive relief in respect of the premises known as 4 Chalmers Crescent Mascot and an amended cross application claiming further declaratory relief. The relief claimed by the Council in the originating process is that the development of the premises for the purposes of a printery is prohibited by cl 10 of the Botany Local Environmental Plan 1995 based upon the relevant zoning controls imposed by that LEP.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate