NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sutherland Shire Council v Nustas [2004] NSWLEC 608 PROSECUTOR: PARTIES : Sutherland Shire Council DEFENDANT: Simon Shibli Nustas FILE NUMBER(S) : 50122 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- Plea of guilty - Breach of consent conditions resulting in damage to trees Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 253 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 21A, s 22 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 125(1), s 126(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 41 Council of Camden v Tax [2004] NSWLEC 448; CASES CITED: Ku-ring-gai Council v Nettcorp Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 203; R v Thompson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 DATES OF HEARING: 17/08/2004 01/11/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/2004
PROSECUTOR: Ms S. Duggan instructed by Baker & McKenzie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr D. Pullinger instructed by Advance Lawyers Pty Limited
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
3 November 2004
50122 of 2003 Sutherland Shire Council v Simon Shibli Nustas
JUDGMENT 1 Her Honour: The Defendant, Mr Nustas, is charged with an offence under s 125(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ("the EP&A Act") in that between 25 and 28 August 2003 he carried out development, being site works, excavations and the construction of access to land, on land known as 179 Fowler Road, Illawong ("the land") which development was not in accordance with the development consent granted by this Court on 25 July 2001 ("the Development Consent"). The particulars in the summons allege that four conditions of the Development Consent were breached by the Defendant as follows: In breach of s 76A(1)(b) of he EP&A Act, the Defendant:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate