NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : ISPT Pty Limited v Valuer General (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 660
APPLICANT PARTIES : ISPT Pty Limited RESPONDENT Valuer General
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30043 of 2005; 30815 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Valuation appeal - valuation too high - costs claimed by successful Applicant - whether the conduct of the Respondent was unreasonable - mixed question of fact and law -
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s69 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 16 r 4 Valuation of Land Act 1916
CASES CITED: AMP Henderson Global Investors Limited AND Others v Valuer General; AMP Henderson Global Investors Limited v Valuer General (No. 2) [2004] NSWLEC 344; Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70
DATES OF HEARING: 19/10/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/20/2006
APPLICANT D Miller (Barrister) SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Gadens Lawyers RESPONDENT A Pickles (Barrister) SOLICITOR Crown Solicitor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
20 October 2006
30043 of 2005, 30815 of 2005 ISPT Pty Limited v Valuer- General (No 2)
JUDGMENT 1 Her Honour: I handed down judgment in these two matters on 7 August 2006 and found for the Applicant in relation to the appropriate valuation of its land for rating purposes for the 2003 and 2004 base date years.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate