NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council & Anor [2003] NSWLEC 202 APPLICANT: Broadwater Action Group Inc
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Richmond Valley Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: New South Wales Sugar Milling Co-Operative Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 10029 of 2003 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- validity - requirement of a species impact statement - flora and fauna assessment - adequacy of - merits of flora and fauna impact Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 5A, s 5C, s 78(8)(b) and s 98(1) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (Cth) 1999 s 9 and s 10 LEGISLATION CITED: Fisheries Management Act 1994 s 220BA State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 - Koala Habitat Protection Sch 2 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 s 37(1), Div 2 Pt 6 s 110, Sch 2 and Sch 3 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 24/07/03; 25/07/03 and 10/09/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2003
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack (agent) SOLICITORS: N/A
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr D P Wilson (barrister) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS: Wilshire Webb
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr A M Pickels (barrister) SOLICITORS: Acuiti Legal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate