NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : St Judes Property Investments v Canada Bay Council [2004] NSWLEC 464 PARTIES : APPLICANT St Judes Property Investments Pty Limited v Canada Bay City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10485 of 2004 CORAM: Brown C Development Application :- demolition of existing industrial building erection of residential flat building SEPP 1 objection to height and density KEY ISSUES: streetscape/character traffic/parking design soil contamination Concord Planning Scheme Ordinance LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: Winten Property Group Limited v North Sydney Council (2001) NSWLEC 46 DATES OF HEARING: 21/07/08, 12/08/04 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/26/2004
APPLICANT Ms S Hill, solicitor SOLICITORS Susan Hill & Associates Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Jackson, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike, Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Commissioner G T Brown
26 August 2004
10485 of 2004 St Judes Property Investments Pty Limited v Canada Bay City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal against the refusal by Canada Bay City Council (the council) of Development Application 635/03 for the demolition of an existing factory building and the construction of a residential flat building at 30-34 Hilly St, Mortlake (the subject site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate