NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Belmore Residents Action Group Incorporated v Canterbury City Council and Anor. [2005] NSWLEC 258
APPLICANT: Belmore Residents Action Group Incorporated PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Canterbury City Council and Anor.
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40119 of 2005
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Motion for security for costs in class 4 proceedings challenging the validity of development consent
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69(3)
Bungendore Residents Group Incorporated v Palerang Council [2005] NSWLEC 235; Hamill v Byron Shire Council (1998) 98 LGERA 400; Hunter Ecologically Sustainable Employment Group Inc v Hez Pty Ltd and Ors (2003) 129 LGERA 344; K B Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189; CASES CITED: Legal and General Life of Australia Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1990) 69 LGRA 201; Melville v Craig Nowlan and Associates (2002) 54 NSWLR 82; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 at 335; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373
DATES OF HEARING: 13/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/20/2005
APPLICANT: Mr J Strati, Solicitor SOLICITORS Avendra Singh Strati and Kam LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr C Leggat, Barrister SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate