NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Carver Place Developments v Parramatta CC [2006] NSWLEC 563
APPLICANT Carver Place Development Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10165 of 2006
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Refusal of an application to modify a consent issued by Council in July 2005, access way, landscaping, height and bulk of the proposal, visual impact and parking, streetscape.
DATES OF HEARING: 29/05/2006 and 12/07/2006 for Preliminary Judgment
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 07/12/2006
APPLICANT Mr A. Pickles, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P. Merancowitz, solicitor of Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
29 May 2006
10165 of 2006 Carver Place Development Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act against Parramatta City Council's refusal of an application to modify a consent issued by the council in July 2005. The subject property is known as Nos. 10 to 12 Carver Place, Dundas Valley.
2 The conditions in question relate to the access way from the street through to the reserve, the removal of a Deodar tree and the deletion of attics to the townhouses.
3 The council consented to a development application for the erection of 18 townhouses with the majority having an attic roof and accommodation in the form of a bedroom and en-suite. (There is a slight variation to that format). Two of the townhouses for example only show store areas, and then there are two townhouses that do not show any dormers at all. The council no longer presses the retention of the Deodar tree, and in fact council has advised this morning that the Deodar tree was previously approved for removal. The Court agrees that the Deodar should not be required to be retained in the overall development, and that a more appropriate species of a canopy tree could be accommodated to replace the Deodar.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate