NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Trenwith & Ors v Sutherland Shire Council & Anor (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 491 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANTS Jon and Lynette Trenwith Hans and Inga Zoeke PARTIES : William and Rita Korremans FIRST RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council SECOND RESPONDENT John Tourvas
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40937 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Civil Enforcement :- final orders requiring changes to structure or demolition
CASES CITED: Trenwith & Ors v Sutherland Shire Council and Anor [2005] NSWLEC 143
DATES OF HEARING: 17/05/2006, 17/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/2006
APPLICANTS Mr A Pickles (Barrister) SOLICITORS Macedone Christie Willis LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIRST RESPONDENT Submitting Appearance
SECOND RESPONDENT In Person
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
7 September 2006
40937 of 2004 Trenwith & Ors v Sutherland Shire Council & Anor (No 2)
JUDGMENT ON FINAL ORDERS 1 Her Honour: I gave a judgment in this matter on 29 August 2005 (Trenwith & Ors v Sutherland Shire Council and Anor [2005] NSWLEC 143) where I made a declaration that the structure erected on the Second Respondent's land did not have development consent. I said that I would not make final orders for demolition at that stage but allow time for the parties to confer and reach agreement on possible alternative orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate