NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Scotcher v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 427 FIRST APPLICANT M Scotcher
PARTIES : SECOND APPLICANT C Scotcher
RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11542 of 2003 CORAM: Moore C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 13 May 2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/04/2004
APPILCANT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Rigg, solicitor Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
04/08/04
03/11542 M & C Scotcher v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 against the refusal by Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (the council) to grant consent to a dual occupancy dwellings on an existing allotment at the corner of Boundary Road and Wahroonga Ave, Wahroonga. The matter was finalised, on the merits, during the course of an on-site inspection in the company of the legal representatives of the parties and their expert advisers on 13 May 2004. These reasons for decision are issued to formalize that process
2 The principal issues which the council stated as warranting refusal of the application were: o the impact on two major trees on the site; and o the fact that the bulk and scale of the proposed western dwelling would be inconsistent with the streetscape in the street when viewed from the west as part of the streetscape of Boundary Road. 3 The latter issue was particularly pressed in light of a development which surrounds the site and which is for persons over the age of 55 or with a disability.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate