NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 145 LGERA 285
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Port Securities Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council and Anor [2006] NSWLEC 136
APPLICANT Port Securities Pty Limited PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Wollongong City Council SECOND RESPONDENT Director General, Department of Planning
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10939 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- SEPP 1 Objection - Whether additional expert witness evidence should be allowed where there is a court appointed expert
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 1(1). State Environmental Planning Policy 1 - Development Standards Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 39 r 6
CASES CITED: Crown Atlantis Joint Venture v Ryde City Council [2005] NSWLEC 303
DATES OF HEARING: 22/03/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/24/2006
APPLICANT Mr M Wright SOLICITORS Minter Ellison FIRST RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr Mantei SOLICITORS Kells Lawyers SECOND RESPONDENT Mr Clay SOLICITORS Department of Planning - Legal Services Branch
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
24 March 2006
10939 of 2005 Port Securities Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate