NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hughes v Council of the City of Sydney [2006] NSWLEC 225
APPLICANT Gavin Hughes PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11507 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :-
DATES OF HEARING: 9 March 2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/09/2006
APPLICANT Mr R d'Apice, solicitor Makinson & d'Apice LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor Maddocks
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
9 March 2006
05/11507 Gavin Hughes v Council of the City of Sydney
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. The consequence of the Court's decision in this appeal will be the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. These conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but will be available for inspection at the Council. In addition, a copy the Court's Orders and the conditions may be obtained from the Court's registry upon payment of a fee. Details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions are available on the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 concerning the refusal by the Council of the City of Sydney (the council) of Development Application 2005/01712 proposing the removal of an existing brick balustrade along the western elevation of unit 18, 101-115 Victoria Street, Potts Point and the replacing of that balustrade with a clear glass balustrade supported by structural aluminium posts at appropriate intervals.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate