NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Goodenough v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 597 APPLICANTS D & G Goodenough PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council . FILE NUMBER(S) : 10918 of 2004 CORAM: Moore C Development Consent :- KEY ISSUES: Appeal against conditions . Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai DCP 38 . Datum Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2003] NSWLEC 62; CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472; . DATES OF HEARING: 26 October 2004 EX TEMPORE 10/26/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANTS Mr B Hones, solicitor Hones Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr R Graham, solicitor Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
26 October 2004
04/10919 D & G Goodenough v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT 1 Commissioner: This is an appeal pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) against a number of conditions imposed by Ku-ring-gai Council (the council) on the landscaping for and location of a proposed retaining wall at premises at 138 Tryon Road, East Lindfield (the site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate