NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stott v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 405
APPLICANT Geoffrey Stott PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10542 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Construction of a free-standing double carport, setback, landscaping, tree vegetation, character of the area
DATES OF HEARING: 16/10/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/16/2006
APPLICANT Mr G Stott, self represented
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J. Studdert, solicitor SOLICITORS Deacons Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
16 October 2006
10542 of 2006 Geoffrey Stott v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 The appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a development application for the construction of free-standing double carport, concrete driveway together with a front fence at No. 27 Warrimoo Avenue, St Ives. The full details of the property, the proposal and the planning controls are contained in the Statement of Basic Facts on which I rely.
2 For the appeal the main issues identified are concerned with the streetscape impacts in terms of the proposal not sufficiently being setback in accordance with the controls. There was concern about the front proposed fences impact on the streetscape character and also the impact on vegetation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate