NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Limited v The Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation [2005] NSWLEC 271
APPLICANT: Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: The Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11358 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- notice to produce - whether relevant to a fact in issue
Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 1 LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 23 r 2 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 s 91
CASES CITED: Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341
DATES OF HEARING: 09/03/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/09/2005
APPLICANT: Mr R Beasley (barrister) SOLICITORS: Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms M England (solicitor) SOLICITORS: State Crown Solicitor's Office
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
9 March 2005
11358 of 2004 Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Limited v The Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT
1 Her Honour: This matter concerns a Class 1 application relating to the refusal of an application for a license to harm or pick threatened species, populations or ecological communities made under s 91 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. That refusal was made by the Respondent, the Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate