NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rethmann Australia Environmental Services Pty Limited v Botany Bay City Council [2004] NSWLEC 96 APPLICANT Rethmann Australia Environmental Services Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Botany Bay City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10613 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- material recycling and fuel substitute generation facility - traffic noise - design standards Botany Development Control Plan No 25 - Moore and Baker Streets Banksmeadow Botany Development Control Plan No 33 - Industrial Development LEGISLATION CITED: Botany Local Environmental Plan 1995 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2001 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 20/10/2003, 21/10/2003, 22/10/2003, 10/2/2004, 11/2/2004, 12/2/2004, 8/3/2004, 9/3/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/18/2004
APPLICANT Mr A Galasso SOLICITORS Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr T Hale SC SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10613 of 2003
Pain J
18 March 2004 RETHMANN AUSTRALIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PTY LTD Applicant v BOTANY CITY COUNCIL Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate