NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rubinstein v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 597 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT AVI Rubinstein PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hornsby Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11450 of 2005
CORAM: Tuor C
Development Consent :- Section 96 application - extend hours of operation, whether substantially the same development KEY ISSUES: adequate off street parking noise impact
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Hornsby Shire Local Environmental Plan 1994
CASES CITED: Moto Projects No. 2 Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [1999] 106 LGERA 298
DATES OF HEARING: 15-16/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/26/2006
APPLICANT Dr S Berveling, barrister SOLICITORS Landerer & Company LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Jackson, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
26 September 2006
11450 of 2005 Rubinstein v Hornsby Shire Council
JUDGMENT
1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Hornsby Shire Council (the council) of an application under s 96(2) (the application) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act). The application seeks to modify development consent (DA 616/04) for the change of use of the existing motel to residential apartments and strata subdivision at 2 City View Road, Pennant Hills (the site). Consent to the development application was granted subject to conditions on 18 August 2004. 2 The application seeks to amend Condition 2 relating to the hours of operation of the café, bar and conference facility and delete Condition 4 restricting the service of alcohol. 3 Condition 2 states:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate