NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 123 LGERA 305
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Agostino & Anor v Penrith City Council [2002] NSWLEC 222 APPLICANTS A. & B. Agostino PARTIES : RESPONDENT Penrith City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11035 of 2002 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- prohibition on expansion of use Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 4, s 79C LEGISLATION CITED: Penrith Local Environmental Plan No. 201 - Rural Lands State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 Fabcot Pty Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council (1997) 93 LGERA 373; CASES CITED: Kentucky Fried Chicken Proprietary Limited v Gantidis & Anor (1979) 140 CLR 675; Kruf v Warringah Shire Council (unreported, Land and Environment Court NSW, 15 December 1988); Strathfield Municipal Council v Poynting (2001) 116 LGERA 319 DATES OF HEARING: 4/11/2002, 5/11/2002, 6/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/13/2002
APPLICANTS Mr M Baird (Barrister)
SOLICITORS n/a LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J Jagot (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 11035 of 2001
COWDROY J
13 December 2002 A. & B. AGOSTINO Applicants v PENRITH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate