NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kilpatrick v Wollongong City Council [2005] NSWLEC 658
APPLICANT Richard Kilpatrick PARTIES : RESPONDENT Wollongong City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10808 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
Development Application :- KEY ISSUES: Inconsistency between registered strata plan and original development consent .
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: .
Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Heaven's Door Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 59; CASES CITED: .
DATES OF HEARING: 17 November 2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/17/2005
APPLICANT Mr G Gleeson, solicitor Morton & Harris LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Mantei, solicitor Kells the Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Moore C
17 November 2005
05/10808 Richard Kilpatrick v Wollongong City Council
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision at an on-site hearing. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. The consequence of the Court's decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. These conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but will be available for inspection at the Council. In addition, a copy the Court's Orders and the conditions may be obtained from the Court's registry upon payment of a fee. Details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions are available on the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate