NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Quach and Ors v Fairfield City Council [2004] NSWLEC 473 APPLICANTS Thu Hong Quach Ngoc Duyen Luu PARTIES : Trung Cang Luu
RESPONDENT Fairfield City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 31618 of 2003 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Compulsory Acquisition of Land :- direct comparison of sales valuation method - caitalisation valuation method - adjoining owner influence Fairfield Local Environment Plan 1994 LEGISLATION CITED: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, s 55, s 56 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 10 Croghan v Hawkesbury City Council (1998) 99 LGERA 375; CASES CITED: Gwynvill Properties Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Main Roads (1983) 50 LGRA 322; Pamalco Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 [No 3] (1990) 71 LGERA 441; Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v The Revenue Divisional Officer Vizagapatam [1939] AC 302 04/08/2004; DATES OF HEARING: 05/08/2004; 06/08/2004 EX TEMPORE 08/06/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr N Hemmings QC (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Allens Arthur Robinson LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Ayling SC
SOLICITORS Ritchie and Castellan
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate