NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Floyd [2004] NSWLEC 214 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Floyd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50053 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- Director of company contravening Act-being occupier of land and permitting it to be used as a waste facility-whether sentence should have regard to existing significant civil liability imposed on Defendant-whether additional penalty offends rule against double jeopardy LEGISLATION CITED: Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, ss 144 and 169 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 122-125, 127 Australian Oil Refining Pty Ltd v Cooper (1987) 11 NSWLR 277; Blacktown City Council v Reid [2003] NSWLEC 120; Blacktown City Council v Wilkie and Ors [2001]NSWLEC 162; Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998) 196 CLR 1; Hawkesbury City Council v Mushroom Composters Pty Ltd (1997) 96 LGERA 12; CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 614; Penrith City Council v 24/7 Waste Bins Pty Ltd [2002] NSWLEC 186; R v Hoar (1981) 148 CLR 32; R v Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; Wilkie v Blacktown City Council (2002) 121 LGERA 444; Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525; Workcover Authority of NSW v State Rail Authority of NSW (2002) NSWIRC 72 DATES OF HEARING: 28/04/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/21/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate