NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Soueid v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 343 APPLICANT Margaret Soueid PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11644 of 2003; 10092 of 2004 CORAM: Moore C Development Application :- Unapproved use as brothel KEY ISSUES: Social impact of continued use Discretion to stay closure order . Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s97, s121B, s121ZK LEGISLATION CITED: Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000 . Weal v Bathurst City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 181; Venus Enterprises Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council (1981) 43 LGERA 67; Kentucky Fried Chicken v Gantidis (1979) 140 CLR 675; Broad v Brisbane City Council (1986) 59 LGRA 296; CASES CITED: Perry Properties Pty Limited v Ashfield Council (No 2) [2001] NSWLEC 62; Novak v Woodville City Council (1990) 70 LGERA 233; New Century Developments Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 154; Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) NSWCA 289; . DATES OF HEARING: 24 May 2004 EX TEMPORE 05/24/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Dr S Berveling, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Jackson, solicitor Pike Pike and Fenwick
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate