NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Martin & Spork v City of Sydney (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 648
APPLICANT Martin & Spork Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT The Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10587 of 2004
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- modification of conditions of consent - existing hotel - access - extension of trial period
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
CASES CITED: Martin & Spork Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 559
DATES OF HEARING: 25/09/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/17/2006
APPLICANT Mr S Austin QC SOLICITORS Phillips Fox LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
17 October 2006
10587 of 2004 Martin & Spork Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Sydney (No. 2)
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the determination by the Council of the City of Sydney (the council) of Application No. D2004/142A (the modification application) to modify conditions attached to Development Application No. D2004/142 (the original application) under s 96(AA) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for alterations and additions to the Empire Hotel at 32-32A Darlinghurst Rd, corner of Roslyn Street, Potts Point (the site). 2 The alterations and additions in the original application provided for the conversion of three shop tenancies into a TAB Sports Bar that would be internally connected to the rest of the hotel premises and would also have access to Roslyn Street. The three shops formed part of hotel building although they had sole access to Roslyn Street.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate