NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Basemount Pty Ltd and Gaofind Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 172 APPLICANTS Basemount Pty Ltd and Gaofind Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11017 of 2000 and 11137 of 2000 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- s 56A appeal - error of law - conceded - two development applications - whether error in one matter affected the other - whether both should be remitted for re-hearing - constitution of Court for re-hearing LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 12(2), s 30, s 38(2), s56A Burwood Municipal Council v Harvey (1995) 86 LGERA 389; Livesey v The New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288; CASES CITED: Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2000) 110 LGERA 217; Steedman and Anor v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [No 2] (1993) 31 NSWLR 562; Winten Property Group Ltd v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 46 DATES OF HEARING: 09/08/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/02/2002
APPLICANTS Mr C W McEwen (Barrister) with Mr A M Pickles (Barrister) SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P C Tomasetti (Barrister) SOLICITORS Corrs Chambers Westgarth
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 11017 of 2000 and 11137 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate