NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cawsey v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 135 APPLICANT Kim Cawsey PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10698 of 2003 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- purpose of development standard - non-compliance - weight attributed to evidence of expert witnesses Development Application :- rejection of SEPP 1 objection - number of opposing expert witnesses not determinative State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 LEGISLATION CITED: Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000 cl 17(c), cl 17(a), cl 19(2) Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2000 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 31/03/2004, 01/04/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/08/2004
APPLICANT Mr J A Cole (Solicitor) SOLICITORS Abbott Tout LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P J McEwen SC SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10698 of 2003
Talbot J
8 April 2004 Kim Cawsey Applicant v Leichhardt Municipal Council Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate