NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Aitchison v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2002] NSWLEC 226 APPLICANT Andrew Aitchison PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : (1)0198 of 2002 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- whether representative applicant can satisfy paramount duty to the Court as an expert witness pursuant to Expert Witness Practice Direction Practice and Procedure:- whether representative applicant can satisfy paramount duty to the Court as an expert witness pursuant to Expert Witness Practice Direction Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 38, s 38(2), s 38(3) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 96, s 96(6), s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 Expert Witness Practice Direction No. 20 cl 2, cl 5, cl 5(1), cl 18 Collins Thomson v Clayton [2002] NSWSC 366, unreported; Fagenblat v Feingold Partners Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 454, unreported; Field v Leeds City Council [1999] CPLR 833 ; CASES CITED: Kirsch Communications Pty Ltd v Gene Engineering Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 485, unreported; Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocesan Trustees Inc v Goldberg (No 3) [2001] 1 WLR 2337; Regina (Factortame Ltd and others) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No 8) [2002] 3 WLR 1104; Steven v Gullis [2000] 1 All ER(CA) 527; Whitehouse v Jordan (H.L.(E.)) (1981) 1 WLR 246 DATES OF HEARING: 19/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/28/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate