NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : John Parkes v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 389
APPLICANT John Parkes PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10308 of 2006
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- modification of approval for dwelling - roof form - effect on heritage item from view loss
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000
CASES CITED: Windy Dropdown Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2000] NSWLEC 240
DATES OF HEARING: 29/06/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/06/2006
APPLICANT Mr B Phillips, solicitor Of: Macedone Christie Willis Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Mathieson, solicitor SOLICITORS Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
6 July 2006
10308 of 2006 John Parkes v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Sutherland Shire Council to modify, under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Development Application No. 04/0300 for the erection of the erection of a dwelling at 4 Loch Lomond Crescent, Burraneer (the site).
2 The modification application relates to the change of the approved curved roof form to a more of traditional pitched roof form. The dwelling approved under Development Application No. 04/0300 has been erected with the roof form proposed in the modification application. In accordance with the decision of Talbot J in Windy Dropdown Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2000] NSWLEC 240, a s 96 application that relates to development that has already being carried out can be considered on its merits. 3 The site has a frontage to Loch Lomond Crescent and slopes from the street to the high watermark of Port Hacking.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate