NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Cargill Australia Limited [2004] NSWLEC 334 PROSECUTOR PARTIES : Environment Protection Authority DEFENDANT Cargill Australia Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50121 of 2004 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- Emission of offensive odour from livestock slaughtering rendering plant - Guilty plea - Appropriate penalty - Whether publication order appropriate - Whether order for restoration or enhancement of the environment appropriate LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 21A, s 23 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 129(1), s241, s 250(1)(a), s 250(1)(c) Camilleri Stockfeeds Pty Limited v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683; Environment Protection Authority v Biosolids Management Pty Limited [2004] NSWLEC 90; Environment Protection Authority v Burrangong Meat Processors [2003] NWSLEC 102; Environment Protection Authority v Illawarra Coke Company Pty Limited (2002) 118 LGERA 451; CASES CITED: Environment Protection Authority v Incitec Limited [2003] NSWLEC 381; Environment Protection Authority v Metalcorp Recyclers Pty Limited [2004] NSWLEC 14; Environment Protection Authority v Nationwide Oil Pty Limited [2002] NSWLEC 201; R v Sharma (2002) 54 NSWLR 301; R v Thompson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 DATES OF HEARING: 02/06/2004 EX TEMPORE 06/04/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate