NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Roulston and Anor v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales; Galea and Anor v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWLEC 409
APPLICANTS Roger James Roulston and Janet Roulston
RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales PARTIES : APPLICANTS Paul Galea and Mary Galea
RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31286 of 2004; 31287 of 2004
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Valuation of Land :- land affected by several proposed uses - whether discount should be applied for affectation - whether affectation the public purpose for which land acquired - quantum of discount to be applied - whether land could be used to calculate floor space ratio
Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 s 55, s 56(1)(a), s 66 LEGISLATION CITED: Roads Act 1993 s 177 Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan 1991 cl 44
Cannavo and Anor v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2004] NSWLEC 570; Commissioner of Succession Duties (South Australia) v Executor Trustee and Agency Company of South Australia Limited and Others (1947) 74 CLR 358; CASES CITED: Housing Commission of New South Wales v San Sebastian Proprietary Limited and Ors (1978) 140 CLR 196; The Crown v Murphy and Another (1990) 64 ALJR 593; 71 LGRA 1
DATES OF HEARING: 18/07/2005, 19/07/2005, 20/07/2005, 21/07/2005, 22/07/2005, 05/08/2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate