NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Arkirbuilt Pty Limited v Ku-Ring-Gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 211
APPLICANT Arkibuilt Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-Ring-Gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10611 of 2005
CORAM: Jagot J - Watts C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Application to modify development consent granted by the Court
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C, s 96(1A), s 96(6) LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 194 State Environmental Planning Policy No 53 – Metropolitan Residential Development
DATES OF HEARING: 10/04/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/10/2006
APPLICANT P Tomasetti and J Johnson SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Nil RESPONDENT A Pickles SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Jagot J
10 April 2006
10611 of 2005
ARKIBUILT PTY LIMITED Applicant
KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT Jagot J: Introduction 1 This is an appeal under s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the "EPA Act"), which the parties seek to resolve by consent.
2 On 23 December 2005, the Court granted consent to DA 282/05 to demolish all improvements and to erect a multi-unit housing development at No's 2-8 Milray Street and No 10 Havilah Lane, Lindfield. It is this consent that the applicant seeks to modify.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate