NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Durbin v Ashfield Council [2004] NSWLEC 686 APPLICANT Michael Durbin PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ashfield Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11092 of 2004 CORAM: Hoffman C Development Application :- S 96 appeal to amend development consent KEY ISSUES: overlooking privacy
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 1985 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 25/11/2004 EX TEMPORE 11/25/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr J Johnson, solicitor Bartier Perry
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Jackson, solicitor Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
25 November 2004
11092 of 2004 Michael Durbin v Ashfield Council
JUDGMENT 1 This was appeal No. 11092 of 2004 between Michael Durbin and Ashfield Municipal Council in regard to the refusal of a s 96 application to amend DA 10.2003.301.1 issued on 10 November 2003.
2 The property involved was No. 10 James Street, Summer Hill. It was a medium sized single storey brick house, circa 1920 to 1930, with a large backyard.
3 Number 8 on its west side is a similar house, again with a large backyard. The property on the east of No. 10 is an Energy Australia yard, nearly all concreted.
4 The backyards of Nos. 8 and 10 are nicely landscaped with some mature trees, shrubs and lawn. Number 10 sought, and had received, an approval for a fairly large back verandah in DA10.2003.301.1, but it has not yet been built.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate