NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Zouki v Liverpool City Council [2003] NSWLEC 35 APPLICANT Joseph Zouki PARTIES : RESPONDENT Liverpool City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10200 of 1994 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Appeal - Development Consent :- appeal of Commissioner's judgment - substantially the same development - modifications subsequent to original consent - merits of appeal - "fine-tooth" approach LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 79C, s 96 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 139; Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1993) 79 LGERA 367; Coles v Woollahra Municipal Council (1986) 59 LGRA 133; CASES CITED: Cyril Smith & Associates Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2001] NSWLEC 150; Moto Projects (No. 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; 97 LGERA 433 ; Randwick Municipal Council v Crawley and Others (1986) 60 LGRA 277 ; Vacik Pty Limited v Penrith City Council (Stein J, NSWLEC, 24 February 1992, unreported) DATES OF HEARING: 10/02/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/28/2003
APPLICANT Mr J. Robson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS M E McMahon and Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr I. Hemmings (Barrister)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate