NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 697
APPLICANT Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10615 of 2005
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Proposed ramp and pontoon - environmental issues - character of the location
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000 LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan 9.2/04 edition 1 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1
DATES OF HEARING: 29/11/2005 and 20/12/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/2005
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/20/2005
APPLICANT Mr T. Howard, barrister SOLICITORS Freidman Reeves
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr G. Mathieson, solicitor for Sutherland Shire Council Legal Branch
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
20 December 2005
10615 of 2005 Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is appeal 10615 of 2005 between Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited and Sutherland Shire Council in regard to a proposal for a proposed ramp and pontoon at No 36 Sandbar Place, Lilli Pilli, which has absolute frontage to the Port Hacking River. The site contains a single dwelling, boat shed, sliprails and jetty at the moment. The application had also included in the original application a request for authorisation of the existing sliprails. However this has been withdrawn from the application. 2 The plans in exhibit B now reflect the proposal that is before me in the modified form. It has been exhibited for comment and there has been no objection from the neighbours. The Court had the benefit of a report from Ms L Collins, town planner of Sutherland Shire Council, for information on the necessary matters to be considered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate