NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
Stonecost P/L v Manly C [2005] NSWLEC 178 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Stonecost Pty Limited
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10610 of 2003
CORAM: Hussey C
Appeal :- s. 96 modification to conditions of consent - hours of operation. KEY ISSUES:
DATES OF HEARING: 05/04/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/05/2005
APPLICANT Mr A JJ Thompson, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms L. Finn, solicitor of Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
5 April 2005
10610 of 2003 Stonecost Pty Limited v Manly Council
JUDGMENT 1 This matter deals with a s 96 modification to conditions of consent, namely the hours of operation of the Steyne Hotel at Manly, to which the parties have agreed to consent orders.
2 The original application provided a condition that allowed for a trial period of 12 months that was predominantly aimed at checking the amenity impacts of the revised hours. During that trial period the applicant has undertaken the work required by the conditions of consent and one of those conditions of consent, required the implementation of a complaints register. Now I am told that that complaints register has been available and in operation and there is no significant complaint registered about the amenity noise from this hotel.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate