NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Longitude Planning v Sutherland SC [2005] NSWLEC 428
APPLICANT Longitude Planning
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10138 of 2004
CORAM: Murrell C
Appeal :- Refusal of subdivision - impact on foreshore and vegetation - cul-de-sac turning circle - adequacy of lot to accommodate dwelling KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000 Development Control Plan - Sandy Point
DATES OF HEARING: Telephone mentions 26/08/2004, 15/10/2004, 3/12/2004,11/02/2005, 03/03/2005, 18/03/2005, 19/04/2005 - (Hearing dates) 27/07/2004 and 19/07/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 07/19/2005
APPLICANT Mr M. Ball, solicitor
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C. Mathieson, solicitor of Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
19 July 2005
10138 of 2004 Longitude Planning v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 This matter has come before me today as consent orders. The appeal was in respect of a refusal by Sutherland Shire Council for a subdivision application of the property known as No. 25 St Georges Crescent, Sandy Point.
2 The matter is one that has since that time progressed in terms of the council's issues that were originally identified in the statement of issues being resolved and this has been due partly to additional land from an adjoining property owner to the north being incorporated in the proposed subdivision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate