Bechara v Plan Urban Services Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] NSWLEC 594

Reported Decision : (2006) 149 LGERA 41

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

CITATION : Bechara v Plan Urban Services Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] NSWLEC 594

APPLICANT Georgette Bechara

FIRST RESPONDENT Plan Urban Services Pty Ltd

PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT John Boulas

THIRD RESPONDENT Australian Advanced Building Pty Ltd

FOURTH RESPONDENT City of Canada Bay Council

FILE NUMBER(S) : 40787 of 2006

CORAM: Jagot J

KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- s 96(1A) modification application - alleged misdirection - whether status of satisfaction formed by consent authority reasonably open - substantially the same and minimal environmental impact

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C, s 96 LEGISLATION CITED: Roads Act 1993 s 138 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 119(2)

ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 149; Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; Austcorp No 459 Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2002) 122 LGERA 205; Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139; King, Markwick, Taylor & Ors v Bathurst Regional Council [2006] NSWLEC 505; CASES CITED: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang and Others (1996) 185 CLR 259; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611; Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; Save our Street Incorporated v Settree (2006) NSWLEC 570; Telstra Corporation Ltd and Another v Hurstville City Council and Others (2002) 118 FCR 198; The Council of the City of Parramatta v Pestell (1972) 128 CLR 305; Wyong Shire Council v MCC Energy Pty Ltd (2005) 139 LGERA 296