NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 144 LGERA 172
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : P F T McGirr v D Xenos [2006] NSWLEC 60
APPLICANT: P F T McGIRR PARTIES : RESPONDENT: D Xenos
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31412 of 2003
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- Alleged failures to comply with Court's Consent Orders—objection to competency of the Contempt Motion because of failure to comply with Rules of Court.
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules 1970 (SCR), Part 42 Rule 8 and Part 55 Rule 13
Australian Meat Industry Employee's Union v Mudginberri Station (1986) 161 CLR 98; Bourke Shire Council v Dwyer (1993) 79 LGERA 185; Clifford v Middleton (1974) VR 737; Doyle v The Commonwealth (1985) 156 CLR 510; Gordon v Gordon (1946) P99; CASES CITED: Iberian Trust Ltd v Founders Trust and Investment Co Ltd (1932) 2 KB 87; Miller v Eurovox Pty Ltd (2004) VSCA 211; Primelife Corp Ltd v Newpark Pty Ltd (2003) VSC 106; Stancomb v Trowbridge Urban Council (1910) 2 Ch 190; Westpac Banking Corporation v Maher (1995) BC 9502504; Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525
DATES OF HEARING: 11/08/2005, 15/08/2005, 17/08/2005, 02/09/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/17/2006
APPLICANT: Mr P W Larkin, Barrister SOLICITORS McGirr James Hall and Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr T S Hale SC and Mr M S White, Barrister SOLICITORS Diamond Peisah & Co
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate